HIGHER
AND HIGHER: AMERICAN DRUG USE IN VIETNAM
©Peter
Brush
Note:
This article appeared in Vietnam magazine, Vol.15, No. 4, December
2002.
Back to articles
In
1898 the United States acquired control of the Philippines. The following year
it began a brutal fight to suppress a guerrilla uprising. It is basic to
guerrilla war that combatants will be mingled with the civilian population.
Social behaviors flow one to the other. Soon after their arrival American
soldiers learned to smoke opium. This practice became sufficiently common that
U.S. Opium Commissioner Hamilton Wright felt compelled to deny it, claiming in a
report to the 1909 Shanghai Opium Commission that "among the personnel of our
Army and Navy [in the Philippines] there is not the slightest evidence that the
use of opium or its derivatives has been introduced...."[1]
In reality, the drug habit among U.S. military personnel was "alarmingly
increasing," so much so that its occurrence was an agenda item at the 1903
meeting of the American Pharmaceutical Association. There the Report of the
Committee on Acquirement of Drug Habits noted that soldiers acquired the
practice from Chinese and native Filipinos and that a number of enlisted men had
been discharged for being habitual drug users. The discharge rate was several
hundred percent higher during the previous five years than for any ten years
before that. [2]
The history of drug use among U.S. military personnel is not
limited to the Philippines insurrection. The next time American soldiers fought
to suppress guerrillas, in Vietnam, the use of drugs by American soldiers
reached epidemic proportions.
Although
marijuana is legally considered a drug according to the federal Controlled
Substances Act, its use was treated differently from other drugs by American
commanders and military lawyers in Vietnam. [3]
This distinction will be maintained here; use of marijuana
will be related separately from use of other drugs.
Marijuana was present in Vietnam before the arrival of the Americans. Drug laws were not well
defined and their enforcement had little priority in the Vietnamese criminal
justice system. There was no central Vietnamese drug enforcement agency and no
government control over marijuana. A survey made in 1966 by the U.S. military
command in the Saigon area showed there were 29 fixed outlets for the purchase
of marijuana. [4]
A comparison has been made between Vietnamese use of marijuana and the
manner in which the French treat wine and sex: there are cultural regulations
for use, sale, and protocol but no inherent sense of "illicitness" as in the
United States. [5]
Journalist Richard Boyle mentions its use by South Vietnamese
soldiers. He even relates an incident where he smoked marijuana with the South
Vietnamese consul in Cambodia. Craven "A" and Park Lane were the popular brands
of grass available in Saigon. It was sold in the form of pre-rolled cigarettes
in genuine Craven "A" and Park Lane packages.
Former North Vietnamese Army (NVA)
soldier Bao Ninh reports that smoking a marijuana-like substance became so
pervasive that use spread throughout his entire regiment. [6]
American soldiers note that the Vietnamese used marijuana
openly. One saw it growing wild in Central Vietnam. Another discovered a
sizeable quantity in the knapsack of a dead NVA soldier at Khe Sanh. [7]
Soldiers began using marijuana in Vietnam as early as 1963, during the
advisory period, and before its use became widespread in the United States. Its
popularity grew steadily. [8]
In 1967 a Congressional investigation discovered 16 instances
of marijuana use inside the Marine brig at Da Nang. The source was Vietnamese
who gave it to prisoners on working parties, often throwing it into passing
vehicles in which prisoners were riding.
Inmates not eligible for working parties did not necessarily have to go
without marijuana. Marine lawyer Captain Robert W. Wachsmuth described how:
Members
of working parties would obtain marijuana seeds [which were] planted in rows of
dirt above the shower stalls which were opened to the outside by the gap between
the tin roof and the wall....Spray from the prisoners' showers would water the
plants. When the plants reached a sufficient size, plastic...would be placed
between the shower spray and the plant, causing the plant to die. The plants
would then be crushed and rolled in toilet paper to make joints.[9]
Other
Marines found easy access from street vendors as their vehicles passed through
urban areas.
For most of the Vietnam War, prosecution for even a slight trace of
marijuana was a court-martial offense for Marines. The lack of a crime
laboratory in Vietnam before 1968 was a major handicap to efforts to punish
marijuana offenders. Drug samples were sent to Japan for testing, a process that
took 45 days to complete. That same year marijuana detecting dogs were pressed
into service to search for marijuana among Marines returning to Vietnam from
R&R trips abroad. [10]
While the Marines were subjecting all marijuana offenders to
courts-martial, the Army took only dealers and users of hard drugs to trial. The
more severe Marine approach was a failure: in 1969, nearly half the cases tried
by the Marine Corps in Vietnam involved marijuana possession. Marijuana use was
no longer confined to rear area units. A drug rehabilitation center was
established at Cua Viet for drug users from infantry battalions. A senior Marine
legal officer admitted the helplessness in stemming the tide of marijuana use:
"I don't know what the solution is....I don't know what the hell we are going to
do." [11]
Before 1968, marijuana use among soldiers was largely ignored by the
Army. Newspaper stories describing its widespread use helped publicize this
situation, inclining Army officials to label it as a problem. Their solution was
a comprehensive program to eradicate its use. Armed Forces radio and television
proclaimed the dangers of marijuana consumption. Drug education lectures became
mandatory. Troop quarters and secluded fields were searched for marijuana.
Soldiers were warned by chaplains, physicians, and legal officers that marijuana
use could cause not only physiological damage and lead to psychosis, but also
result in injury to men dependent on them. Arrests for marijuana possession
reached as many as 1,000 in a single week.
Marijuana use was fairly easy to detect: it is a bulky commodity and
emits a distinct odor when smoked. Consequently, the Army was able to wage a
vigorous suppression campaign. In 1968, responding to U.S. pressure, the
Vietnamese government publicly condemned the sale and use of marijuana. Province
chiefs were ordered to forbid its cultivation. Aircraft were used to locate
marijuana fields and South Vietnamese troops were sent into the field to destroy
crops. U.S. Army Press releases claimed the drug problem was being brought under
control. Eventually the anti-marijuana campaign by the Army was relaxed,
although use remained high among enlisted personnel and junior officers. [12]
In fact, marijuana use was mostly a problem because it conflicted with
American civilian and military values. Use of marijuana did not constitute an
operational problem. Smoking in rear areas did not impact operations. Use among
combat personnel came when units stood down rather when in the field. The
Commanding General of the 3d Marine Division noted "there is no drug problem out
in the hinterlands, because there was a self-policing by the troops themselves."
Life for combat soldiers depended on their being clear-headed. [13]
Army Major Joel Kaplan of the 98th Medical Detachment realistically
appraised the use of marijuana. While noting that marijuana was used at high
rates, alcohol consumption among career military personnel was a larger problem.
"I think alcohol is a much more dangerous drug than marijuana." [14]
One Air Force officer understood well the difference: "When you get up there
in those early hours, you want the klunk you're flying with to be able to snap
to. He's a lot more likely to be fresh if he smoked grass the night before than
if he was juiced." A much larger problem was on the horizon for American
military commanders in Vietnam. When heroin use became commonplace, one Army commanding officer
rationally described the implications of marijuana use. "If it would get them to
give up the hard stuff, I would buy all the marijuana and hashish in the Delta
as a present." [15]
Soldiers in Vietnam smoked marijuana and took other drugs who would not
do so at home. A soldier's friends become extremely important; new soldiers
adhere to behavior of members of their group. Marine commander Major Ives W.
Neely claimed "at least 70 to 80 percent" use within his company. Marines would
catch a new man as he reported into the unit, instructing him that if he was
going to buy marijuana he would buy it from them. If anyone told, turned in any
of their names, "there were ways to do these people in." [16]
When young men, many still teenagers, are in a strange land and
surrounded by enemies (real and
potential), they do not have to be cajoled into assuming the habits of their new friends who proceeded them to
Vietnam. One former Marine related his first experience with marijuana in the
form of hashish. He was with a small group guarding the Hai Van Pass, certainly
one of the most beautiful places in Asia in terms of physical geography. Fresh
water flowed in a pipe on a hill near an oil refinery and emptied into the South
China Sea. Vietnamese fishermen would come ashore while the Marines bathed in
the pipeline outflow. For ten piasters (about ten cents), the Marines could buy
French bread, hashish, and fresh lobsters from the Vietnamese. The Marines
smoked the hashish in a pipe fashioned out of a M-14 shell casing. With their
appetites stimulated from the hashish, they ate the bread. The lobsters were
flash-fried in a helmet. Cooking fuel was provided by plastic explosives (C-4),
which burns vigorously when ignited. This practice was a common one for the
platoon guarding the oil refinery at the Hai Van Pass in 1965. [17]
It was a practice that would prove impossible to eradicate.
Other drugs were available to U.S. forces. In 1967 opium cost $1.00 while
morphine went for $5.00 per vial. Tablets of Binoctal, an addictive drug
consisting of Amytal and Seconal, were available in tablet form from Vietnamese
children at from $1.00 to $5.00 for twenty tablets. Although technically a
prescription drug, Binoctal was available over the counter at almost any
Vietnamese pharmacy for about eight piasters for twenty tablets. Twenty tablets,
consumed at once, was a fatal dose. One soldier had died from Binoctal use, and
three near-fatalities had been reported. "O.J.'s" were opium joints. After 1970
the name was often a misnomer, since heroin was widely available to U.S. forces.
A tobacco cigarette was rolled between the finger and thumb to loosen the
tobacco. The cigarette was partially emptied. A vial containing 250 milligrams
of 94 to 96 percent pure heroin was poured into the cigarette, which was
smoked. [18]
Widespread heroin use would dwarf previous drug problems among
U.S. servicemen in Vietnam. It was the attempt of the U.S. military command to
suppress the use of marijuana that caused to the switch to heroin. [19]
Chinese immigrants to Vietnam in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth
centuries brought their opium smoking habit with them. Initially the emperors of
Vietnam welcomed these Chinese for their entreprenuerial skills. Over time opium
addiction appeared among the Vietnamese. In the 1830s Britain exported opium
from India to China in large quantities. Opium smokers in Vietnam paid for their
opium in silver, causing a drain of specie and inflation in Vietnam. The
Vietnamese court strongly opposed opium smoking on both moral and economic
grounds, and opium was outlawed soon after it appeared.
The French fought their way into Vietnam about the time of the U.S. Civil
War. In order to pay an indemnity to the French, the emperor established an
opium franchise in the northern region. Opium became a lucrative source of
income for French colonial administrators. A modern opium refinery was
constructed in Saigon. Opium dens and shops were opened to meet consumer demand.
By 1918 there were 1,512 dens and 3,098 retail opium shops in French Indochina
and the opium business was booming. [20]
By the beginning of World War II Indochina had over 100,000 opium
addicts. By now the opium source was Iran and Turkey and imports totaled about
60 tons annually. During the war the British blockaded shipping to Indochina,
forcing the French to expand opium production in Laos and Vietnam to avert a
fiscal crisis. Indochinese opium production increased from 7.5 tons in 1940 to
over 60 tons in 1944. By the late 1950s the region was self-sufficient in opium
production. By 1969 the Golden Triangle (the opium producing regions of Laos,
Thailand, and Burma) was harvesting 1,000 tons of raw opium annually.
In late 1969 and early 1970, Golden Triangle laboratories instituted a
more sophisticated opium refinement process, allowing them to produce high-grade
(80 to 99 percent pure) no. 4 heroin. A CIA report said the adoption of this new
production technique seemed to be due to the large market in South Vietnam.
Previously heroin had been unavailable in South Vietnam. Now teenagers sold it
to American soldiers on the highways; street dealers gave it to GIs as they
walked through Saigon, and maids sold it to military personnel while cleaning
their living quarters. In 1970 there were 1,146 arrests for hard drugs. The
following year arrests in this category increased to 7,026. That year 1971 U.S.
Army medical officers estimated that 10 to 15 percent of the lower-ranking
enlisted personnel in Vietnam were heroin users. [21]
Psychoanalyst Dr. Norman E. Zinberg, a consultant for the Department of
Defense on drug abuse in Vietnam, noted that heroin use was done casually by
U.S. troops. More than one-third picked up the habit during their first month in
Vietnam, and probably 90 percent in their first four months. A typical heroin
user in Vietnam was quite unlike the typical heroin user in the United States:
the soldiers may have come from small towns in the Midwest or South. All ethnic
and educational groups were represented in about equal proportion. Users existed
in administrative, combat-support, and combat occupational specialties. Combat
troops avoided heroin use in the field. Zinberg notes one soldier who stood down
after 13 days on a long patrol. One of his first actions was to pour a vial of
heroin into a large shot of vodka and drink it.
In the U.S. heroin was injected and rarely smoked. In Vietnam, where the
drug was much more pure, the opposite was the normal route of consumption.
Heroin was also snorted and taken orally. These means of ingestion minimized the
physical risks of injection. There were no deaths from overdose. Men used heroin
to pass the time, to deal with the danger, boredom, and purposelessness of their
lives. [22]
In terms of physical geography, South Vietnam consists of a coastal plain
in the east and a long mountain chain in the west in addition to the Mekong
delta in the far south. The source of opium lay on the other side of the
Annamite Mountains. Opium and later heroin dealers in Vietnam had to have
connections in the Golden Triangle area and means of transporting the drug back
into South Vietnam. In the 1950s the French provided these transportation
services through their association with Laotian military irregulars. By
1965-1967 the Vietnamese Air Force under Colonel Nguyen Cao Ky shipped opium
from Laos to Saigon. Professor Alfred W. McCoy speculates that the May 1970
invasion of Cambodia may have opened another route of entry into South Vietnam.
Most reports give early 1970 as the beginning of large scale heroin addiction
among U.S. military personnel. Before the invasion Cambodia was hostile to
pro-American regimes in South Vietnam. After the invasion there were large
volumes of truck, naval, and air traffic between South Vietnam and Cambodia. [23]
Heroin was used by an estimated 15-20 percent of the GIs in the Mekong
Delta under the command of Army Major General John Cushman. In mid-1971 Cushman
ordered a crackdown. All troops were confined to base, guard patrols were
increased, all personnel entering base areas were searched, and emergency
medical clinics were established. Cushman determined these efforts were futile
as long as the South Vietnamese protected drug dealers among the Vietnamese
population. With drug smuggling entrenched among the Vietnamese air force, army,
navy, police, customs, and politicians, the importation and sale of narcotics
was too lucrative to eradicate. Further, there was an unwritten rule among U.S.
embassy personnel to not implicate high-ranking Vietnamese in connection with
the traffic in heroin. The CIA avoided gathering information on Vietnamese
involvement. Within two weeks after its beginning Cushman's campaign fell off in
intensity. [24]
Nonmedical drug use was a serious crime for soldiers in Vietnam. The
usual punishment for convicted offenders was the maximum sentence: up to ten
years' confinement, dishonorable discharge from the military, and forfeiture of
all pay and allowances. Alcoholics, by contrast, were given unsuitability
discharges, which usually were honorable or general. That soldiers were not
deterred from heroin use speaks to the special conditions they faced in Vietnam.
Heroin was also available in neighboring Thailand. Even though heroin supplies
there were greater than in Vietnam, heroin use among Army and Air Force
personnel was less than one percent.
The different rates of heroin use between military personnel in South
Vietnam and Thailand reflected the different natures of duty in those countries.
In Thailand, men got days off from work. They were free to travel among the
friendly Thai population. There was no anxiety caused by danger from enemy
action. Military duty was considered purposeful. By contrast, military service
in Vietnam during the era of troop withdrawals was considered less meaningful.
Soldiers worked seven days a week, often 12 hours per day, and felt there was
little point in getting killed before the war was officially declared over. Many
U.S. military personnel felt the Vietnamese tried to take every possible
economic advantage of them. Soldiers were taught to not trust the civilian
population; there were frequent reminders that civilians might be Viet Cong
supporters. The goal of lower-ranking military personnel in Vietnam was to stay
alive for one year and return home. Heroin use was a way to pass the time while
thinking about leaving. [25]
Drugs did not only affect the lower ranks. In 1970 an Air Force major was
apprehended at Tan Son Nhut air base near Saigon with $8 million dollars worth
of heroin in his aircraft. In 1971 a colonel was court-martialed for leading
marijuana parties in his squadron. Nor were U.S. security forces immune: that
year 43 military policemen at Cam Ranh Air Force Base were arrested in narcotics
raids. At Pleiku, a newly arrived lieutenant was gunned down in front of his
entire platoon by four Army drug dealers. The company and battalion commanders
were relieved of their commands; the feeling was both should have known about
the drug dealing in their command. In 1971 U.S. customs at an Army post in New
Jersey seized about 15 pounds of heroin from Bangkok in a package mailed through
the U.S. military postal system. In March and April 1971 248 pieces of mail
containing drugs were detected by customs in the Army and Air Force postal
systems. [26]
In late 1970 heroin made its way to Marine Corps units operating in the
northern part of South Vietnam. Marine Brigadier General Edwin H. Simmons
considered the effect of its use on Marines, saying it was
"impossible to quantify just how
debilitating drug use may have been....In general, poor performance attracts
attention which leads to revelation of drug use. But this does not 'prove' that
drug use caused the poor performance nor does it give any indication of how many
'good' performers use drugs."
Marine
Major General Alan J. Armstrong was more decisive in his analysis of heroin's
effects, noting that in one aviation unit at least, heroin use was an
operational problem and no longer only an administrative
problem.
Military commands employed all available media to inform personnel of the
moral, legal, and physical consequences of drug use. Pamphlets were created and
distributed to platoon leaders. Drug education teams gave lectures. Drug abuse
councils were created, traveling from unit to unit to spread the word. When
education failed to stem the use of drugs, the Marine Corps relied upon
punishment. When the judicial system could not court martial Marines fast
enough, administrative discharges were used to get rid of offenders. The feeling
of Marine Corps Commandant General Louis H. Wilson Jr. was that the Corps would
go down in strength rather than allow unsuitable Marines to stay within its
ranks. [27]
Senior military leaders understood that new arrivals were being
introduced to drugs by existing users among the U.S. forces in Vietnam. Ridding
itself of users was chosen to "guard against further infection." Amnesty
programs for users were the means to accomplish this house cleaning. The Navy
selected two barracks ships moored at Nha Be (near Saigon) for the site of its
rehabilitation center. Within one month 100 hundred sailors had turned
themselves in for treatment. By comparison, at the same time (July 1 1971) the
Army was treating 460 men while 350 airmen sought drug treatment. [28]
Drug use was less of a problem in the Marine Corps than in the Army.
Towns and villages in the Marines' area of responsibility were off limits to
Marines, thereby limiting their accessibility to drugs. Marine units began
withdrawing from Vietnam in 1969, with the last Marine ground unit out of the
country by 1971. The Army remained in Vietnam until the end, fighting a
defensive campaign to cover the U.S. withdrawal. This was when the drug problems
of the Army peaked: in 1973, 34 percent of American soldiers in Vietnam had
commonly used heroin. [29]
On June 22, 1971 the Army instituted its new program to deal with drug
use. Every soldier leaving Vietnam was obligated to submit to a urinalysis test
that detected heroin use within the previous five days. Those with positive test
results were confined to a detoxification center and not allowed to return home
until they could pass the test. Coupled with mandatory testing was the amnesty
program, guaranteeing every soldier the right to declare himself an addict and
receive treatment. By September 22 (a period less than three months), 3,580
armed forces personnel had tested positive for heroin use.
This
program was flawed in its execution. Unit commanders began declaring anyone who
failed two drug tests to be of "negligible value to the United States Army." The
U.S. military command in Vietnam discharged between one thousand and two
thousand heroin addicts per month. These men were flown back to the United
States and discharged almost immediately. Follow-up treatment was mostly
nonexistent. In August 1971 a congressional subcommittee on public health noted
that Veterans Administration hospitals handled only three referrals out of
12,000 heroin-using servicemen from Vietnam. Now on their own, many of these
veterans returned to communities as addicts that had always been free from
heroin addiction. Two years later a White House task force survey found that
one-third of those servicemen who had tested positive for heroin in Vietnam were
still heroin addicts. [30]
The market for heroin among U.S. military personnel was worth $88 million
dollars to South Vietnamese drug traffickers, who viewed naively viewed heroin
as solely "an American problem." [31]
These profits were taken even though the Vietnamese had the
most to lose from the withdrawal of American military forces. Golden Triangle
heroin laboratories did not go out of business when American soldiers stepped up
their withdrawal from Vietnam. In 1971 the Laotian ambassador to France was
apprehended with 60 kilograms of heroin destined for the United States. Later
that year a diplomat from the Philippines was arrested in New York with 15.5
kilograms of Laotian heroin. During the twenty years before 1972, the U.S.
Bureau of Narcotics claimed that only five percent of America's heroin came from
Southeast Asia. By 1972 that figure had risen to 30 percent.
In 1974 there were an estimated 150,000 Vietnamese heroin addicts in
Saigon. The following year, with the fall of the government in the South, these
addicts became the problem of the new communist regime, in a manner similar to
that of American Vietnam veteran addicts in the United States.32 The United
States was unable to end its heroin problem in Vietnam even by ending its
participation in the war: heroin came home with us. [32]
[1]
David
T. Courtwright, Dark Paradise (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,
1982), p. 202n.
[2]
E. G. Eberle et al., "Report of Committee on the Acquirement of Drug Habits,"
Proceedings of the American Pharmaceutical Association, 1903, vol. 51, p.
475.
[3]
Gary
D. Solis, Marines and Military Law in Vietnam: Trial by Fire,
(Washington, D.C.: Headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps), 1989, p. p.
74n.
[4]
George
S. Prugh, Law at War: Vietnam 1964-1973, (Washington, D.C.: Department of
the Army, 1975, p. 106.
[5]
Electronic
communication from John S. Baky dated August 2, 1996. Baky was a military
policeman in Vietnam.
[6]
6Richard
Boyle, The flower of the Dragon, (San Francisco: Ramparts Press, 1972),
p. 190, 212. Bao Ninh, The Sorrow of War, (New York, NY: Riverhead
Books), 1996, p. 10.
[7]
The
author raised the issue of Vietnamese use of marijuana on the Internet Usenet
Newsgroup Soc.History.War.Vietnam on August 1, 1996. The comments about open use
by the Vietnamese and marijuana growing wild are in email communications to the
author by American veterans who wish to remain anonymous. The report of
marijuana in the knapsack of a dead NVA soldier was related to the author at the
1993 reunion of Khe Sanh veterans in Washington, D.C.
[8]
Norman
E. Zinberg, "G.I.'s and O.J.'s in Vietnam," New York Times Magazine,
December 5, 1971, p. 120.
[10]
Solis,
pp. 74-75, 104. W. Hays Parks, "Statistics Versus Actuality in Vietnam," Air
University Review, vol. 32, no. 4, May-June 1981, p. 86.
[12]
Zinberg, ibid.,
Prugh, p. 107.
[17]
Electronic
mail communication dated August 5, 1996, from a Marine Vietnam veteran who
wishes to remain anonymous.
[18]
Solis,
p. 74; Zinberg, p. 37, 114; Boyle, 69.
[20]
Alfred
W. McCoy, The Politics of Heroin, (Chicago, IL: Lawrence Hill), 1991, pp.
109-111.
[21]
McCoy,
pp. 113, 115, 222-223; Prugh, p. 107.
[22]
Zinberg,
p. 114, 116, 118, 122.
[23]
McCoy,
pp. 196-197, 225-226.
[24]
McCoy,
pp. 224-225, 255.
[25]
Zinberg,
pp. 116, 118, 122-123; Cosmas and Murray, p. 361n.
[26]
Robert
D. Heinl, Jr., "The Collapse of the Armed Forces,"in Marvin E. Gettleman et.
al., Vietnam and America, (New York: Grove Press), 1995, p. 329; James
Kittfield, Prodigal Soldiers, (New York: Simon & Schuster), 1995, p.
189, 190; McCoy, p. 259.
[27]
Graham
A. Cosmas and Terrence P. Murray, U.S. Marines in Vietnam, 1970-1971,
(Washington, D.C.: Headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps), pp. 360-361; Solis, pp.
231-232.
[28]
R.
L. Schreadley, From the Rivers to the Sea, (Annapolis, MD: Naval
Institute Press), 1992, p. 368.
[29]
Parks,
p. 85, 86; McCoy, p. 258.
[30]
McCoy,
pp. 256-258; Schreadley, p. 369.
[31] McCoy, p. 224; Frances
Fitzgerald, Fire in the Lake, (New York: Vantage Books), 1973, p.
564.